RSPCA urges dog fight law change
A change in the law is needed to tackle a rise in dog fighting that is leaving an increasing number of animals with horrific injuries, the RSPCA has said.
The existing ban on four breeds was inadequate and the law must "focus back on the real problem... the owner", said the charity's Claire Robinson.
Dog fighting-related calls to the RSPCA had risen 12-fold since 2004, with two thirds involving youths, it said.
Ministers say penalties for dog fighting have been toughened.
The new wave of dog fighting, known as "chain fighting" or "rolling", involves informal fights often held in inner city public parks, says the RSPCA.
"[People] are seeing young people, often gangs of young people, in parks, on estates, some even put two dogs in a lift at the top of the block of flats and will press the button and let the dogs fight until they get to the bottom," Ms Robinson told BBC News.
"Fortunately they are reporting it to us and the police, but often by the time we get there the people are gone and the dogs can't be found."
The RSPCA says a new generation are using rottweilers (left) in dog fights
|
The charity is seeing dogs with "unprecedented levels" of injuries, says the RSPCA's David Grant.
"We see two or three fights most days. At the weekend it can be quite bad - a few weekends ago we had 10", he said.
"We frequently see ears torn off, eyes torn out. In my career as a vet - nearly 42 years - this is the worst it has ever been.
"I have never seen things as bad as this."
'Limited powers'
The Dangerous Dogs Act, which came into force in 1991, bans four different breeds - the pit bull terrier, Japanese Tosa, Dogo Argentino and Fila Brasileiro.
But NHS figures show dog attacks have tripled since 1991, with many blamed on cross-bred dogs which are not illegal.
Rottweilers or Staffordshire bull terriers were often involved in the "ad hoc" fights staged by gangs of young men in parks, the RSPCA said.
The charity wants the law to focus on people keeping aggressive dogs as a status symbol or weapon, with more checks on owners and stiffer penalties for people mistreating dogs or keeping them for criminal use.
"It's a lot to do with the sort of MTV gang culture - people want to look hard, they want to look tough, with a dog that looks tough," Ms Robinson said.
The RSPCA insists the authorities still have limited powers to seize dogs kept by their owners as weapons.
Ministers say there are now tougher penalties for dog fighting and that the new Policing and Crime Bill will make it easier to seize dogs owned by criminal gangs.

August 22nd, 2010 - 09:29
I am all for Dog Fighting to be fully outlawed but question the ongoing silence of the RSPCA when it comes to the horrific destruction of Foxes by the hunting fraternity.
It may be banned but those arrogant pillars of society who indulge in this activity are openly defying the law and falsely claim that kills are “accidents”. They have even managed to get the police to stop harassing them in any shape or form.
I note that you have foolishly pursued people who have disposed of the alien Grey Squirrels by drowning etc and hope you are proud of yourselves for targetting the ‘little man’.
Surely the disposal of foxes by tearing them apart with a pack of hounds is also unnecessary cruelty and yet I can find no record of the RSPCA prosecuting fox hunters for inflicting gross cruelty just to satisfy their blood lust.
I will never again contribute a penny towards your charity as it is a clear demonstration of double standards.